Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Doctor of Digital's avatar

What you’ve written here is striking, Heather, because it exposes something leadership theorists have been circling for centuries: the tension between acceptance and authority.

Augustine would say that a restless heart tries to manage its environment by pleasing others, while Aquinas notes that virtue requires “rightly ordered loves”—including the courage to disappoint people for the sake of the good. Nietzsche, in his own way, warned that those who seek affirmation eventually become “last men,” blinking in fear instead of acting with conviction.

Your two scenarios—The Chronic People-Pleaser and The Over-Committer—aren’t just workplace habits; they’re identity-level patterns. Managers lose authority not because they lack competence, but because they’ve outsourced their center of gravity to the opinions around them. When someone softens every sentence, their team hears the whisper beneath it: I’m not sure I have the right to lead you.

And yet, when managers reclaim clarity without cruelty, something remarkable happens: their presence shifts. People stop listening because they “like” them and start listening because they trust them.

Your masterclass is well-timed. Many leaders today are trying to unlearn the emotional overcorrections that kept them safe early in their careers but limit them now.

And as someone who helps thinkers and emerging leaders turn their hard-won insight into books that actually shape culture, I’ll add this: the moment managers stop people-pleasing is often the moment their real voice begins to emerge.

If any readers here are exploring writing as a way to clarify that voice—and perhaps build a book that outlasts trends—my door is open.

Expand full comment

No posts